Tarah Wheeler and Josephine Wolff analyze a recent court decision that the NotPetya attacks are not considered an act of war under the wording of Merck’s insurance policy, and that the insurers must pay the $1B+ claim. Wheeler and Wolff argue that the judge “did the right thing for the wrong reasons..”
More Stories
How Confidence Between Teams Impacts Cyber Incident Outcomes
Infosecurity recently joined an Immersive Labs Cyber Drill to experience how organizations can enhance their preparedness through training and simulations...
New MedusaLocker Ransomware Variant Deployed by Threat Actor
Cisco Talos has observed the financially motivated threat actor targeting organizations globally with a MedusaLocker ransomware variant called “BabyLockerKZ” Read...
Sellafield Fined for Cybersecurity Failures at Nuclear Site
A UK court has fined Sellafield Ltd £332,500 for cybersecurity failings related to the running of the Sellafield nuclear facility...
Sellafield nuclear site hit with £332,500 fine after “significant cybersecurity shortfalls”
The UK's Sellafield nuclear waste processing and storage site has been fined £332,500 by regulators after its IT systems were...
CRI Releases Guidance on Avoiding Ransomware Payments
The Counter Ransomware Initiative has released new guidance discouraging organizations from making ransomware payments Read More
Litespeed Cache Plugin Flaw Allows XSS Attack, Update Now
The new LiteSpeed Cache flaw (CVE-2024-47374) allows unauthenticated code injection across more than six million active installations Read More