Category Archives: CWE

CWE-364 – Signal Handler Race Condition

Read Time:1 Minute, 33 Second

Description

The software uses a signal handler that introduces a race condition.

Modes of Introduction:

– Architecture and Design

 

Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-362
CWE-415
CWE-416
CWE-123

 

Consequences

Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Modify Application Data, Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

It may be possible to cause data corruption and possibly execute arbitrary code by modifying global variables or data structures at unexpected times, violating the assumptions of code that uses this global data.

Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity

If a signal handler interrupts code that is executing with privileges, it may be possible that the signal handler will also be executed with elevated privileges, possibly making subsequent exploits more severe.

 

Potential Mitigations

Phase: Requirements

Description: 

Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description: 

Design signal handlers to only set flags, rather than perform complex functionality. These flags can then be checked and acted upon within the main program loop.

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

Only use reentrant functions within signal handlers. Also, use validation to ensure that state is consistent while performing asynchronous actions that affect the state of execution.

CVE References

  • CVE-1999-0035
    • Signal handler does not disable other signal handlers, allowing it to be interrupted, causing other functionality to access files/etc. with raised privileges
  • CVE-2001-0905
    • Attacker can send a signal while another signal handler is already running, leading to crash or execution with root privileges
  • CVE-2001-1349
    • unsafe calls to library functions from signal handler
  • CVE-2004-0794
    • SIGURG can be used to remotely interrupt signal handler; other variants exist
  • CVE-2004-2259
    • SIGCHLD signal to FTP server can cause crash under heavy load while executing non-reentrant functions like malloc/free.

CWE-365 – DEPRECATED: Race Condition in Switch

Read Time:42 Second

Description

This entry has been deprecated. There are no documented cases in which a switch’s control expression is evaluated more than once.

It is likely that this entry was initially created based on a misinterpretation of the original source material. The original source intended to explain how switches could be unpredictable when using threads, if the control expressions used data or variables that could change between execution of different threads. That weakness is already covered by CWE-367. Despite the ambiguity in the documentation for some languages and compilers, in practice, they all evaluate the switch control expression only once. If future languages state that the code explicitly evaluates the control expression more than once, then this would not be a weakness, but the language performing as designed.

Modes of Introduction:

 

 

Related Weaknesses

 

Consequences

 

Potential Mitigations

CVE References

CWE-366 – Race Condition within a Thread

Read Time:44 Second

Description

If two threads of execution use a resource simultaneously, there exists the possibility that resources may be used while invalid, in turn making the state of execution undefined.

Modes of Introduction:

– Architecture and Design

 

Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-362
CWE-662
CWE-662

 

Consequences

Integrity, Other: Alter Execution Logic, Unexpected State

The main problem is that — if a lock is overcome — data could be altered in a bad state.

 

Potential Mitigations

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description: 

Use locking functionality. This is the recommended solution. Implement some form of locking mechanism around code which alters or reads persistent data in a multithreaded environment.

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description: 

Create resource-locking validation checks. If no inherent locking mechanisms exist, use flags and signals to enforce your own blocking scheme when resources are being used by other threads of execution.

CVE References

CWE-367 – Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

Read Time:3 Minute, 0 Second

Description

The software checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource’s state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check. This can cause the software to perform invalid actions when the resource is in an unexpected state.

This weakness can be security-relevant when an attacker can influence the state of the resource between check and use. This can happen with shared resources such as files, memory, or even variables in multithreaded programs.

Modes of Introduction:

– Implementation

 

Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-362
CWE-362

 

Consequences

Integrity, Other: Alter Execution Logic, Unexpected State

The attacker can gain access to otherwise unauthorized resources.

Integrity, Other: Modify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories, Modify Memory, Other

Race conditions such as this kind may be employed to gain read or write access to resources which are not normally readable or writable by the user in question.

Integrity, Other: Other

The resource in question, or other resources (through the corrupted one), may be changed in undesirable ways by a malicious user.

Non-Repudiation: Hide Activities

If a file or other resource is written in this method, as opposed to in a valid way, logging of the activity may not occur.

Non-Repudiation, Other: Other

In some cases it may be possible to delete files a malicious user might not otherwise have access to, such as log files.

 

Potential Mitigations

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description: 

Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.

Phase: Implementation, Architecture and Design

Description: 

If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description: 

Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.

CVE References

  • CVE-2003-0813
    • A multi-threaded race condition allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash or reboot) by causing two threads to process the same RPC request, which causes one thread to use memory after it has been freed.
  • CVE-2004-0594
    • PHP flaw allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by aborting execution before the initialization of key data structures is complete.
  • CVE-2008-2958
    • chain: time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in program allows bypass of protection mechanism that was designed to prevent symlink attacks.
  • CVE-2008-1570
    • chain: time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in program allows bypass of protection mechanism that was designed to prevent symlink attacks.

CWE-368 – Context Switching Race Condition

Read Time:1 Minute, 16 Second

Description

A product performs a series of non-atomic actions to switch between contexts that cross privilege or other security boundaries, but a race condition allows an attacker to modify or misrepresent the product’s behavior during the switch.

This is commonly seen in web browser vulnerabilities in which the attacker can perform certain actions while the browser is transitioning from a trusted to an untrusted domain, or vice versa, and the browser performs the actions on one domain using the trust level and resources of the other domain.

Modes of Introduction:

– Architecture and Design

 

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-362
CWE-364

 

Consequences

Integrity, Confidentiality: Modify Application Data, Read Application Data

 

Potential Mitigations

CVE References

  • CVE-2009-1837
    • Chain: race condition (CWE-362) from improper handling of a page transition in web client while an applet is loading (CWE-368) leads to use after free (CWE-416)
  • CVE-2004-2260
    • Browser updates address bar as soon as user clicks on a link instead of when the page has loaded, allowing spoofing by redirecting to another page using onUnload method. ** this is one example of the role of “hooks” and context switches, and should be captured somehow – also a race condition of sorts **
  • CVE-2004-0191
    • XSS when web browser executes Javascript events in the context of a new page while it’s being loaded, allowing interaction with previous page in different domain.
  • CVE-2004-2491
    • Web browser fills in address bar of clicked-on link before page has been loaded, and doesn’t update afterward.

CWE-369 – Divide By Zero

Read Time:35 Second

Description

The product divides a value by zero.

This weakness typically occurs when an unexpected value is provided to the product, or if an error occurs that is not properly detected. It frequently occurs in calculations involving physical dimensions such as size, length, width, and height.

Modes of Introduction:

– Implementation

 

Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-682
CWE-682
CWE-682
CWE-682

 

Consequences

Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

A Divide by Zero results in a crash.

 

Potential Mitigations

CVE References

CWE-37 – Path Traversal: ‘/absolute/pathname/here’

Read Time:58 Second

Description

A software system that accepts input in the form of a slash absolute path (‘/absolute/pathname/here’) without appropriate validation can allow an attacker to traverse the file system to unintended locations or access arbitrary files.

Modes of Introduction:

– Implementation

 

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-36
CWE-160

 

Consequences

Confidentiality, Integrity: Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories

 

Potential Mitigations

Phase: Implementation

Effectiveness: High

Description: 

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application’s current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

CVE References

  • CVE-2002-1345
    • Multiple FTP clients write arbitrary files via absolute paths in server responses
  • CVE-2000-0614
    • Arbitrary files may be overwritten via compressed attachments that specify absolute path names for the decompressed output.

CWE-370 – Missing Check for Certificate Revocation after Initial Check

Read Time:1 Minute, 12 Second

Description

The software does not check the revocation status of a certificate after its initial revocation check, which can cause the software to perform privileged actions even after the certificate is revoked at a later time.

If the revocation status of a certificate is not checked before each action that requires privileges, the system may be subject to a race condition. If a certificate is revoked after the initial check, all subsequent actions taken with the owner of the revoked certificate will lose all benefits guaranteed by the certificate. In fact, it is almost certain that the use of a revoked certificate indicates malicious activity.

Modes of Introduction:

– Architecture and Design

 

Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-299
CWE-296
CWE-297
CWE-298

 

Consequences

Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity

Trust may be assigned to an entity who is not who it claims to be.

Integrity: Modify Application Data

Data from an untrusted (and possibly malicious) source may be integrated.

Confidentiality: Read Application Data

Data may be disclosed to an entity impersonating a trusted entity, resulting in information disclosure.

 

Potential Mitigations

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description: 

Ensure that certificates are checked for revoked status before each use of a protected resource. If the certificate is checked before each access of a protected resource, the delay subject to a possible race condition becomes almost negligible and significantly reduces the risk associated with this issue.

CVE References

CWE-372 – Incomplete Internal State Distinction

Read Time:20 Second

Description

The software does not properly determine which state it is in, causing it to assume it is in state X when in fact it is in state Y, causing it to perform incorrect operations in a security-relevant manner.

Modes of Introduction:

– Architecture and Design

 

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-664

 

Consequences

Integrity, Other: Varies by Context, Unexpected State

 

Potential Mitigations

CVE References