NIST is planning a significant update of its Cybersecurity Framework. At this point, it’s asking for feedback and comments to its concept paper.
Do the proposed changes reflect the current cybersecurity landscape (standards, risks, and technologies)?
Are the proposed changes sufficient and appropriate? Are there other elements that should be considered under each area?
Do the proposed changes support different use cases in various sectors, types, and sizes of organizations (and with varied capabilities, resources, and technologies)?
Are there additional changes not covered here that should be considered?
For those using CSF 1.1, would the proposed changes affect continued adoption of the Framework, and how so?
For those not using the Framework, would the proposed changes affect the potential use of the Framework?
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework has turned out to be an excellent resource. If you use it at all, please help with version 2.0.
More Stories
Smashing Security podcast #411: The fall of Troy, and whisky barrel scammers
Renowned cybersecurity expert Troy Hunt falls victim to a phishing attack, resulting in the exposure of thousands of subscriber details,...
Stripe API Skimming Campaign Unveils New Techniques for Theft
A novel skimming attack has been observed by Jscramber, using the Stripe API to steal payment information by injecting malicious...
Royal Mail Investigates Data Breach Affecting Supplier
A cyber threat actor has claimed to have leaked 144GB of data from Royal Mail users Read More
Gray Bots Surge as Generative AI Scraper Activity Increases
Gray bots surge as generative AI scraper activity increases, impacting web applications with millions of requests daily Read More
Bybit Heist Fuels Record Crypto-Theft Surge, Says CertiK
Hackers stole $1.67bn of cryptocurrencies in the first quarter of 2025, a 303% increase Read More
Rational Astrologies and Security
John Kelsey and I wrote a short paper for the Rossfest Festschrift: “Rational Astrologies and Security“: There is another non-security...