Description

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

Modes of Introduction:

– Architecture and Design

 

Likelihood of Exploit: High

 

Related Weaknesses

CWE-788
CWE-787

 

Consequences

Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)

Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.

Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Modify Memory

Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program’s implicit security policy. Besides important user data, heap-based overflows can be used to overwrite function pointers that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker’s code. Even in applications that do not explicitly use function pointers, the run-time will usually leave many in memory. For example, object methods in C++ are generally implemented using function pointers. Even in C programs, there is often a global offset table used by the underlying runtime.

Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other

When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.

 

Potential Mitigations

Phase:

Description: 

Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.

Phase: Architecture and Design

Description: 

Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.

Phase: Build and Compilation

Description: 

Pre-design through Build: Canary style bounds checking, library changes which ensure the validity of chunk data, and other such fixes are possible, but should not be relied upon.

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

Implement and perform bounds checking on input.

Phase: Implementation

Description: 

Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Look for their safe equivalent, which checks for the boundary.

Phase: Operation

Description: 

Use OS-level preventative functionality. This is not a complete solution, but it provides some defense in depth.

CVE References

• CVE-2007-4268
  • Chain: integer signedness error (CWE-195) passes signed comparison, leading to heap overflow (CWE-122)

• CVE-2009-2523
  • Chain: product does not handle when an input string is not NULL terminated (CWE-170), leading to buffer over-read (CWE-125) or heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122).

• CVE-2021-29529
  • Chain: machine-learning product can have a heap-based
    buffer overflow (CWE-122) when some integer-oriented bounds are
    calculated by using ceiling() and floor() on floating point values
    (CWE-1339)