Smart Hotel Technologies and the Cybersecurity Risks They Bring

Read Time:5 Minute, 46 Second

The content of this post is solely the responsibility of the author.  LevelBlue does not adopt or endorse any of the views, positions, or information provided by the author in this article. 

Smart technologies are being quickly adopted by the hospitality sector in order to improve guest experiences and improve operations. However, hotels are also popular targets for cybercriminals due to their extensive collection of data and increased connectivity.

These linked devices have flaws that could allow for illegal access and data breaches, risking the security and privacy of visitors. This article examines the cybersecurity risks related to these technologies and provides helpful advice on how passengers may protect their data while taking advantage of these benefits.

Smart Technologies and the Risks that They Bring

A new wave of technology in the hotel sector promises to improve visitor experiences and operational effectiveness. Smart technologies like IoT-enabled gadgets and AI-powered services are being incorporated into modern hotels. These include mobile check-in, keyless entry for a quick, contactless experience, AI-powered chatbots and automated concierge systems for smooth guest interactions, smart in-room entertainment systems that allow guests to control various aspects of their environment via voice commands or smartphone apps, and smart thermostats for customized climate control.

While these innovations significantly enhance convenience and personalization, they also introduce considerable cybersecurity risks. The interconnected nature of these devices and the vast amounts of data they handle make hotels and Airbnb rooms attractive targets for cybercriminals.

Here are some of the most dangerous cybersecurity threats facing modern hospitality settings.

Data Breaches

Data breaches are a major concern in the hospitality industry due to the vast amounts of sensitive guest information collected and stored. High-profile incidents, such as the Marriott data breach in 2018, which affected up to 500 million guest records, underscore the severity of this threat. Compromised data often includes personal identification details, credit card information, and even passport numbers, leading to significant financial and reputational damage for the affected hotels and Airbnb hosts​.

IoT Vulnerabilities

The globalization of IoT devices in accommodation businesses like hotels and Airbnb properties increases the attack surface for cybercriminals. Each connected device represents a potential entry point for hackers. For instance, vulnerabilities in smart thermostats or lighting systems can be exploited to gain access to the broader network, compromising other critical systems and guest data​.

Phishing and Social Engineering

Phishing attacks and social engineering tactics are prevalent in the hospitality industry. Cybercriminals often target staff and guests with deceptive emails or messages designed to steal login credentials or other sensitive information. These attacks can lead to unauthorized access to systems and data breaches​.

Point of Sale (POS) Systems

POS systems handle numerous financial transactions, making them attractive to hackers. Attacks on POS systems can involve malware that captures credit card information before it is encrypted. Such incidents have occurred at several major hotel chains, including Hilton, which faced significant data breaches due to vulnerabilities in their POS systems​.

Hotel and Airbnb Wi-Fi Networks

Unsecured Wi-Fi networks in hotels and Airbnb rentals pose significant risks to both guests and operations. Cybercriminals can exploit vulnerabilities in these networks to intercept data transmitted by guests or to launch attacks on internal systems. This can lead to significant data breaches and operational disruptions​.

Third-Party Vendors

Hotels and Airbnb hosts often rely on third-party vendors for various services, including payment processing and guest management systems. These vendors can introduce additional cybersecurity risks if they do not adhere to robust security standards. A breach at a third-party vendor can compromise data and systems, making it vital to ensure partners follow strict cybersecurity protocols​.

Ransomware

Ransomware attacks, where hackers lock systems and demand a ransom to restore access, are becoming increasingly common. These attacks can cripple operations, preventing guests from checking in or out and disrupting services. The financial and operational impact of ransomware attacks can be devastating, leading to significant losses and reputational damage​.

Cybersecurity Best Practices for Hotels

While travelers can adopt practical tips to protect their personal information—such as using secure networks, creating strong passwords, monitoring bank statements, and being cautious with personal information—the primary responsibility for cybersecurity rests with the hotels. According to John Nousis, a seasoned professional in the hospitality industry and co-founder of Travelmyth, a hotel search engine focusing on travelers’ specific interests and needs, “In today’s digital age, ensuring the cybersecurity of our guests is as important as providing them with a comfortable stay. At Travelmyth, we help travelers, especially professionals, find hotels that meet their specific needs, including those with strong cybersecurity measures.”

But how can hotels achieve the best possible security for their clients? There are certain practices every hotel should follow in 2024 according to Mr. Nousis. Here are some of his suggestions:

Network Segmentation

Hotels should separate guest and administrative networks to prevent unauthorized access. By isolating guest Wi-Fi from internal systems, hotels can limit the potential damage of a cyber attack. This approach helps contain breaches and protects sensitive operational data from being accessed through guest networks​.

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

Implementing MFA adds an extra layer of security to hotel systems. Requiring multiple forms of authentication, such as a password and biometric verification, significantly enhances protection against unauthorized access. This is particularly important for accessing sensitive data and critical systems​.

Regular Security Audits and Updates

Regular security audits help identify vulnerabilities in hotel systems. Keeping software and hardware up-to-date ensures that known security issues are addressed promptly. Frequent updates and patches are essential to protect against the latest cyber threats​.

Employee Training

Educating staff about cybersecurity threats and best practices is crucial. Regular training sessions can help employees recognize phishing attempts and other social engineering tactics. A well-informed staff is a strong line of defense against cyber attacks​.

“By adopting these cybersecurity best practices, hotels can significantly reduce the risk of cyber threats and ensure a safer environment for their guests. Travelers, meanwhile, should remain aware and follow basic cybersecurity tips to protect their personal information while enjoying these modern conveniences,” Mr. Nousis concludes.

Conclusion

The cybersecurity environment in the hotel sector will change as smart technologies continue to progress. Though they are going to keep improving visitor experiences, AI systems and IoT devices will also become more advanced and provide new security risks. For the protection of their visitors’ data, hotels need to take the initiative to have strong cybersecurity safeguards in place. In this continuous effort, regular updates, network segmentation, multi-factor authentication, and comprehensive employee training serve as key factors.

The future will demand even more awareness and innovation in cybersecurity practices. By staying ahead of potential threats and continuously improving their defenses, hotels can ensure that the benefits of smart technologies are enjoyed safely. Both hotels and travelers must remain informed and cautious, embracing the conveniences of modern technology while prioritizing security.

Read More

xmedcon-0.24.0-1.fc40

Read Time:18 Second

FEDORA-2024-f02d23b92b

Packages in this update:

xmedcon-0.24.0-1.fc40

Update description:

update xmedcon to 0.24.0
fixes:
Bug 2283157 – xmedcon-0.24.0 is available
Bug 2283100 – CVE-2024-29421 xmedcon: Heap overview when parsing DICOM medical files [fedora-all]
Bug 2283099 (CVE-2024-29421) – CVE-2024-29421 xmedcon: Heap overview when parsing DICOM medical files

Read More

xmedcon-0.24.0-1.fc39

Read Time:18 Second

FEDORA-2024-3dbd2c53ac

Packages in this update:

xmedcon-0.24.0-1.fc39

Update description:

update xmedcon to 0.24.0
fixes:
Bug 2283157 – xmedcon-0.24.0 is available
Bug 2283100 – CVE-2024-29421 xmedcon: Heap overview when parsing DICOM medical files [fedora-all]
Bug 2283099 (CVE-2024-29421) – CVE-2024-29421 xmedcon: Heap overview when parsing DICOM medical files

Read More

tcpreplay-4.5.1-1.fc39

Read Time:2 Minute, 51 Second

FEDORA-2024-740d26aaf7

Packages in this update:

tcpreplay-4.5.1-1.fc39

Update description:

Announcing v4.5.1

This release contains contributions from a record number of new contributors. This is greatly appreciated since I am a team of one, and do Tcpreplay maintenance in my spare time.

There are many bug fixes and new features. Most notable features:

AF_XDP socket support – if you have a newer Linux kernel, you will be able to transmit at line rates without having to install 3rd party kernel modules (e.g. netmap, PF_RING)
-w tcpreplay option – this overrides the -i option, and allows you to write to a PCAP file rather than an interface
–include and –exclude tcpreplay options – allows replay of a list of specific packet numbers to replay. This may slow things down, so consider using in combination with -w.
–fixhdrlen tcpreplay option – added to control action on packet length changes
-W tcpreplay option – suppress warnings when replaying
SLL2( Linux “cooked” capture encapsulation v2)
Haiku support

What’s Changed

Add support for LINUX_SLL2 by @btriller in #728
Feature #727 – Linux SLL v2 by @fklassen in #820
Bug #779 – honour overflow for all PPS values by @fklassen in #821
AF_XDP socket extension using libxdp api by @plangarbalint in #797
Feature #822 – AF_XDP socket extension by @fklassen in #823
Nanosec accurate packet processing by @plangarbalint in #796
Handle IPv6 fragment extension header by @ChuckCottrill in #832
Bug #837 – handle IPv6 fragment extension header by @fklassen in #838
Feature #796 – nanosecond packet processing by @fklassen in #836
configure.ac: unify search dirs for pcap and add lib32 by @shr-project in #819
Feature #839 – add pull request template by @fklassen in #840
ipv6 – add check for extension header length by @GabrielGanne in #842
Bug #827 PR #842 IPv6 extension header – staging by @fklassen in #859
add check for empty cidr by @GabrielGanne in #843
Bug #824 and PR #843: check for empty CIDR by @fklassen in #860
Add option to turn on/off fix packet header length by @ChuckCottrill in #846
Bug #703 #844 PR #846: optionally fix packet header length –fixhdrlen by @fklassen in #861
Bug 863: fix nansecond timestamp regression by @fklassen in #865
autotools – AC_HELP_STRING is obsolete in 2.70 by @GabrielGanne in #856
some Haiku support by @infrastation in #847
configure.ac: do not run conftest in case of cross compilation by @ChenQi1989 in #849
dlt_jnpr_ether_cleanup: check config before cleanup by @Marsman1996 in #851
Fix recursive tcpedit cleanup by @GabrielGanne in #855
Bug #813: back out PR #855 by @fklassen in #866
Bug #867 – run regfree() on close by @fklassen in #868
Bug #869 tcpprep memory leak include exclude by @fklassen in #870
Bug #811 – add check for invalid jnpr header length by @fklassen in #872
Bug #792 avoid assertion and other fixes by @fklassen in #873
Bug #844 tap: ignore TUNSETIFF EBUSY errors by @fklassen in #874
Bug #876 – add missing free_umem_and_xsk function by @fklassen in #877
Feature #878 – add -w / –suppress-warning option by @fklassen in #879
Bug #835 false unsupported dlt warnings on 802.3 (Ethernet I) and LLC by @fklassen in #880
Feature #884 include exclude options by @fklassen in #885
Feature #853 direct traffic to pcap by @fklassen in #871
Feature #853 restore missing -P command by @fklassen in #887
Bug #888: check for map == NULL in cidr.c by @fklassen in #889

Read More

tcpreplay-4.5.1-1.fc40

Read Time:2 Minute, 51 Second

FEDORA-2024-ecd4cc8435

Packages in this update:

tcpreplay-4.5.1-1.fc40

Update description:

Announcing v4.5.1

This release contains contributions from a record number of new contributors. This is greatly appreciated since I am a team of one, and do Tcpreplay maintenance in my spare time.

There are many bug fixes and new features. Most notable features:

AF_XDP socket support – if you have a newer Linux kernel, you will be able to transmit at line rates without having to install 3rd party kernel modules (e.g. netmap, PF_RING)
-w tcpreplay option – this overrides the -i option, and allows you to write to a PCAP file rather than an interface
–include and –exclude tcpreplay options – allows replay of a list of specific packet numbers to replay. This may slow things down, so consider using in combination with -w.
–fixhdrlen tcpreplay option – added to control action on packet length changes
-W tcpreplay option – suppress warnings when replaying
SLL2( Linux “cooked” capture encapsulation v2)
Haiku support

What’s Changed

Add support for LINUX_SLL2 by @btriller in #728
Feature #727 – Linux SLL v2 by @fklassen in #820
Bug #779 – honour overflow for all PPS values by @fklassen in #821
AF_XDP socket extension using libxdp api by @plangarbalint in #797
Feature #822 – AF_XDP socket extension by @fklassen in #823
Nanosec accurate packet processing by @plangarbalint in #796
Handle IPv6 fragment extension header by @ChuckCottrill in #832
Bug #837 – handle IPv6 fragment extension header by @fklassen in #838
Feature #796 – nanosecond packet processing by @fklassen in #836
configure.ac: unify search dirs for pcap and add lib32 by @shr-project in #819
Feature #839 – add pull request template by @fklassen in #840
ipv6 – add check for extension header length by @GabrielGanne in #842
Bug #827 PR #842 IPv6 extension header – staging by @fklassen in #859
add check for empty cidr by @GabrielGanne in #843
Bug #824 and PR #843: check for empty CIDR by @fklassen in #860
Add option to turn on/off fix packet header length by @ChuckCottrill in #846
Bug #703 #844 PR #846: optionally fix packet header length –fixhdrlen by @fklassen in #861
Bug 863: fix nansecond timestamp regression by @fklassen in #865
autotools – AC_HELP_STRING is obsolete in 2.70 by @GabrielGanne in #856
some Haiku support by @infrastation in #847
configure.ac: do not run conftest in case of cross compilation by @ChenQi1989 in #849
dlt_jnpr_ether_cleanup: check config before cleanup by @Marsman1996 in #851
Fix recursive tcpedit cleanup by @GabrielGanne in #855
Bug #813: back out PR #855 by @fklassen in #866
Bug #867 – run regfree() on close by @fklassen in #868
Bug #869 tcpprep memory leak include exclude by @fklassen in #870
Bug #811 – add check for invalid jnpr header length by @fklassen in #872
Bug #792 avoid assertion and other fixes by @fklassen in #873
Bug #844 tap: ignore TUNSETIFF EBUSY errors by @fklassen in #874
Bug #876 – add missing free_umem_and_xsk function by @fklassen in #877
Feature #878 – add -w / –suppress-warning option by @fklassen in #879
Bug #835 false unsupported dlt warnings on 802.3 (Ethernet I) and LLC by @fklassen in #880
Feature #884 include exclude options by @fklassen in #885
Feature #853 direct traffic to pcap by @fklassen in #871
Feature #853 restore missing -P command by @fklassen in #887
Bug #888: check for map == NULL in cidr.c by @fklassen in #889

Read More

News, Advisories and much more

Exit mobile version