Data residency laws require that companies operating in a country keep data about its citizens on servers located in that country. For companies that have customers or employees in multiple countries, the regulatory requirements can be onerous and difficult to keep up with.
Previously, “safe harbor” laws or tokenization-based approaches helped companies address the issue, but recent regulatory changes have made both approaches less workable. Meanwhile, countries like China, Russia and Brazil have been making changes to their data residency requirements.
In 2020, European courts upended the previous data transfer mechanisms — the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield and standard contractual clauses. In summer 2021, new guidance was released, and companies now have until the end of 2022 to switch to new standard contractual clauses that comply with the new requirements.
In summer 2021, China passed a new data security law, which went into effect in September, with significant financial penalties for companies that violate its new cross-border data transfer rules. This was soon followed by a personal information protection law, China’s answer to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which took effect in November.
Brazil passed its own version of the GDPR in fall 2020 and began enforcing it in August 2021.
Russia adopted a data localization law in 2014, then upped the fines on violations significantly in 2019. Last summer, a new law required companies with significant numbers of Russian users to have not just servers but physical offices in Russia. That law went into effect at the start of 2022.
According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 133 countries have legislation in place to protect data and privacy and another 20 are working on draft legislation. As a result of these and other changes, companies now either set up local servers for the jurisdictions where they do business and residency laws apply, use cloud providers that offer residency support, or work with a newly emerging class of vendors called residency-as-a-service providers.
More Stories
Friday Squid Blogging: Squid Werewolf Hacking Group
In another rare squid/cybersecurity intersection, APT37 is also known as “Squid Werewolf.” As usual, you can also use this squid...
Solar Power System Vulnerabilities Could Result in Blackouts
Forescout researchers found multiple vulnerabilities in leading solar power system manufacturers, which could be exploited to cause emergencies and blackouts...
Nine in Ten Healthcare Organizations Use the Most Vulnerable IoT Devices
Claroty revealed that 89% of healthcare organizations use the top 1% of riskiest Internet-of-Medical-Things (IoMT) devices Read More
VanHelsing ransomware: what you need to know
First reported earlier in March 2025, VanHelsing is a new ransomware-as-a-service operation. Read more in my article on the Tripwire...
Trump CISA Cuts Threaten US Election Integrity, Experts Warn
Expert speakers discussed the impact of reported cutbacks to CISA on the ability of local officials to protect against surging...
Morphing Meerkat PhaaS Platform Spoofs 100+ Brands
A PhaaS platform, dubbed 'Morphing Meerkat,' uses DNS MX records to spoof over 100 brands and steal credentials, according to...