Posted by Matthew Fernandez on Sep 19
What is the security boundary being violated here? As a maintainer of
some of the packages implicated here, I’m unsure what my actionable
tasks are. The threat model(s) for my packages does not consider crashes
to be a security violation. On the other side, things like crypto code
frequently use their own non-GMP implementation of bignum arith for this
(and other) reason.
Not trying to brush this off. But I’m just trying to gain an…
More Stories
iwd-3.3-1.fc40 libell-0.71-1.fc40
FEDORA-2024-0fa283c43a Packages in this update: iwd-3.3-1.fc40 libell-0.71-1.fc40 Update description: iwd 3.3: Fix issue with handling External Authentication. iwd 3.2: Fix...
iwd-3.3-1.fc41 libell-0.71-1.fc41
FEDORA-2024-256818da09 Packages in this update: iwd-3.3-1.fc41 libell-0.71-1.fc41 Update description: iwd 3.3: Fix issue with handling External Authentication. iwd 3.2: Fix...
A Vulnerability in Apache Struts2 Could Allow for Remote Code Execution
A vulnerability has been discovered in Apache Struts2, which could allow for remote code execution. Apache Struts2 is an open-source...
CyberDanube Security Research 20241219-0 | Authenticated Remote Code Execution in Ewon Flexy 205
Posted by Thomas Weber | CyberDanube via Fulldisclosure on Dec 21 CyberDanube Security Research 20241219-0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- title| Authenticated Remote Code...
USN-7179-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Andy Nguyen discovered that the Bluetooth L2CAP implementation in the Linux kernel contained a type-confusion error. A physically proximate remote...
USN-7173-2: Linux kernel vulnerabilities
Ziming Zhang discovered that the DRM driver for VMware Virtual GPU did not properly handle certain error conditions, leading to...