US Supreme Court leak investigation highlights weak and ineffective risk management strategy

January 23, 2023

Read Time:42 Second

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has announced that its investigation to find the insider who leaked a draft opinion of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org. decision to media outlet Politico has come up empty.

In a nutshell, the court’s insider risk management program, designed to protect the information the justices handle on a daily basis, failed—and failed miserably. Frankly, based on the findings of the report, the court’s insider risk management program—if it existed—was anemic at best.

The investigation, detailed in a 23-page report released on January 19, indicates that the court’s methodology was judged to be thorough by Michael Chertoff of the Chertoff Group, who was asked to review the marshal of the court’s investigative results.

To read this article in full, please click here

RansomHouse ransomware: what you need to know

Slopsquatting

The AI Fix #46: AI can read minds now, and is your co-host a clone?

North Korean Hackers Exploit LinkedIn to Infect Crypto Developers with Infostealers

Compliance Now Biggest Cyber Challenge for UK Financial Services

Bot Traffic Overtakes Human Activity as Threat Actors Turn to AI

Organizations Found to Address Only 21% of GenAI-Related Vulnerabilities

LabHost Phishing Mastermind Sentenced to 8.5 Years

Closing the Gap: How to Build a Consistent Exposure and Vulnerability Management Workflow