FEDORA-2024-e0b0ad79b2
Packages in this update:
python-urllib3-1.26.19-1.fc39
Update description:
Update to 1.26.19 to fix CVE-2024-37891 (rhbz#2292790)
python-urllib3-1.26.19-1.fc39
Update to 1.26.19 to fix CVE-2024-37891 (rhbz#2292790)
python-urllib3-1.26.19-1.fc40
Update to 1.26.19 to fix CVE-2024-37891 (rhbz#2292790)
python-urllib3-1.26.19-1.fc41
Automatic update for python-urllib3-1.26.19-1.fc41.
* Wed Jun 26 2024 Lumir Balhar <lbalhar@redhat.com> – 1.26.19-1
– Update to 1.26.19 to fix CVE-2024-37891 (rhbz#2292790)
Two authentication bypass vulnerabilities affect Progress Software’s MOVEit Transfer SFTP service in a default configuration and MOVEit Gateway
A novel malware strain, Snowblind, bypasses security measures in banking apps on Android, leading to financial losses and fraud, according to Promon
What is our real job as parents? Is it to ensure our kids get good grades? – Maybe. Or is it ensuring we can give them the latest and greatest clothing and devices? Mmmm, not really. When all is said and done, I believe our real job is to keep our kids safe, teach them to be independent, and set them up for success – both online and offline.
As first-generation digital parents, many of us are learning on the job. While we can still glean advice from our own parents on dealing with our teenager’s hormones and driving challenges, there’s no intergenerational wisdom for anything digital. So, it is inevitable that many of us parents feel unsure about how and why to be proactive about online safety.
With four grown boys, 12 nieces and nephews, and almost 13 years in this job talking to families about online safety, I’ve developed a pretty good understanding of how families want to live their lives online, their biggest concerns, and how they value safety and security. Here’s what I’ve learnt:
I’ve often dreamt about wrapping my boys in cotton wool and keeping them away from the real world. But unfortunately, that’s not how it works. The internet definitely has some hugely positive features for teens and tweens but there are some challenges too. Here is what parents are most concerned about:
1. Social Media
Without a doubt, tween and teen social media usage would currently be the biggest concern for most parents. In Australia, there is currently a move to delay children using social media to 16. The Prime Minister is a fan as are many state and territory leaders. There’s no doubt parents are concerned about the impact social media is having on their children’s mental health. Whether dealing with followers, friends, or FOMO (fear of missing out), harassment, or exposure to unhelpful, or even dangerous influencers, parents are worried and often feel helpless about how best to help their kids.
2. Bullying
Parents have every right to be concerned. Cyberbullying does happen. In fact, 1 child in 3 reports being the victim of cyberbullying according to a UNICEF study. And in a study conducted by McAfee in 2022 that does a deep dive into the various types of bullying, there’s no doubt that the problem is still very much a reality.
3. Inappropriate Content
There really isn’t anything you can’t find online. And therein lies the problem. With just a few clicks, a curious, unsupervised 10-year-old could access images and information that would be wildly inappropriate and potentially traumatic. And yes, I’m talking sex, drugs and rock and roll themes! There are things online that little, inexperienced eyes are just not ready for – I am not even sure I am either, to be honest!
4. Screen Time
While I think many parents still find the word screen time a little triggering, I think some parents now realise that not all screen time ‘was created equally’. It’s more about the quality and potential benefit of screen time as opposed to the actual time spent on the screen. For example, playing an interactive, good quality science game as opposed to scrolling on Instagram – clearly the game wins!
However, parents are still very concerned that screen time doesn’t dominate their kids’ lives and adversely affects their kids’ levels of physical activity, face-to-face time with family and friends, and their ability to sleep.
While there is no silver bullet here, being proactive about your family’s online security is THE best way of protecting your family members, minimising the risk of unpleasant interactions, and setting them up for a positive online experience. And it will also reduce your stress big time – so it’s a complete no-brainer!!
Here are 5 things you can kick off today that will have a profound impact on your family’s online security:
1. Talk, talk, talk!!
Yes, that’s right – simply talk! Engaging with your kids about their online lives – what they like to do, sites and apps they use and any concerns they have is one of the best ways to keep them safe. As is sharing your own stories. If your kids know that you understand the digital world, they will be far more likely to come to you if they experience any issues at all. And that’s exactly what we want!!
2. Parental Controls and Monitoring
Parental controls can work really well alongside a proactive educational approach to online safety. As well as teaching kids healthy digital habits, they can also help parents monitor usage, set limits, and even keep tabs on their kids’ whereabouts. Gold!! Check out more details here.
3. Social Media Safety
Undertake an audit of all family member’s privacy settings to ensure that are set to the highest level. This will ensure only trusted people can view and interact with your kids’ profiles. Also, remind your kids not to overshare as it could lead to their identities being stolen. And check out McAfee’s Social Privacy Manager which can help you manage more than 100 privacy settings on social media accounts in seconds.
4. Make a Plan In Case of Aggressive Behaviour
As a cup-half-full type, I’m not a fan of negativity but I am a fan of plans. So, I do recommend creating an action plan for your kids in case they encounter something tricky online, in particular bullying or aggressive behaviour. I recommend you tell them to take screenshots, disengage, tell someone they trust (ideally you), and report the behaviour to the relevant social media platform or app. In some cases, you could involve your child’s school however this obviously depends on the perpetrator.
5. Passwords please!
I know you have probably heard it before, but password management is such a powerful way of staying safe online. In an ideal world, every online account should have its own unique password. Why? Well, if your logins get stolen in a data breach then the cybercriminals will not be able to reuse them to log into any of your other accounts.
And while you’re at it, ensure all passwords are at least 8-10 characters long, and contain random symbols, numbers and both upper and lowercase letters. If all is too hard, simply engage a password manager that will both generate and remember all the passwords for you. What a relief!
And of course, it goes without saying that a big part of being safe online is having super-duper internet protection software that will give you (and your family members) the best chance of a safe and secure online experience. McAfee+’s family plans not only give you a secure VPN, 24/7 identity and financial monitoring and alerts but AI-powered scam protection and advanced anti-virus that will protect each of your family members from fake texts, risky links, viruses, malware and more. Sounds like a plan to me!!
Till next time
Stay safe everyone!
Alex
The post What Security Means to Families appeared first on McAfee Blog.
Andreas Hasenack discovered that netplan incorrectly handled the permissions
for netdev files containing wireguard configuration. An attacker could use this to obtain
wireguard secret keys.
It was discovered that netplan configuration could be manipulated into injecting
arbitrary commands while setting up network interfaces. An attacker could
use this to execute arbitrary commands or escalate privileges.
Alon Zahavi discovered that the NVMe-oF/TCP subsystem in the Linux kernel
did not properly validate H2C PDU data, leading to a null pointer
dereference vulnerability. A remote attacker could use this to cause a
denial of service (system crash). (CVE-2023-6356, CVE-2023-6535,
CVE-2023-6536)
Chenyuan Yang discovered that the RDS Protocol implementation in the Linux
kernel contained an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker could use
this to possibly cause a denial of service (system crash). (CVE-2024-23849)
It was discovered that a race condition existed in the Bluetooth subsystem
in the Linux kernel, leading to a null pointer dereference vulnerability. A
privileged local attacker could use this to possibly cause a denial of
service (system crash). (CVE-2024-24860)
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
– ARM64 architecture;
– PowerPC architecture;
– RISC-V architecture;
– S390 architecture;
– Core kernel;
– x86 architecture;
– Block layer subsystem;
– Cryptographic API;
– ACPI drivers;
– Android drivers;
– Drivers core;
– Power management core;
– Bus devices;
– Device frequency scaling framework;
– DMA engine subsystem;
– EDAC drivers;
– ARM SCMI message protocol;
– GPU drivers;
– IIO ADC drivers;
– InfiniBand drivers;
– IOMMU subsystem;
– Media drivers;
– Multifunction device drivers;
– MTD block device drivers;
– Network drivers;
– NVME drivers;
– Device tree and open firmware driver;
– PCI driver for MicroSemi Switchtec;
– Power supply drivers;
– RPMSG subsystem;
– SCSI drivers;
– QCOM SoC drivers;
– SPMI drivers;
– Thermal drivers;
– TTY drivers;
– VFIO drivers;
– BTRFS file system;
– Ceph distributed file system;
– EFI Variable file system;
– EROFS file system;
– Ext4 file system;
– F2FS file system;
– GFS2 file system;
– JFS file system;
– Network file systems library;
– Network file system server daemon;
– File systems infrastructure;
– Pstore file system;
– ReiserFS file system;
– SMB network file system;
– BPF subsystem;
– Memory management;
– TLS protocol;
– Ethernet bridge;
– Networking core;
– IPv4 networking;
– IPv6 networking;
– Logical Link layer;
– MAC80211 subsystem;
– Multipath TCP;
– Netfilter;
– NetLabel subsystem;
– Network traffic control;
– SMC sockets;
– Sun RPC protocol;
– AppArmor security module;
– Intel ASoC drivers;
– MediaTek ASoC drivers;
– USB sound devices;
(CVE-2023-52612, CVE-2024-26808, CVE-2023-52691, CVE-2023-52618,
CVE-2023-52463, CVE-2023-52447, CVE-2024-26668, CVE-2023-52454,
CVE-2024-26670, CVE-2024-26646, CVE-2023-52472, CVE-2024-26586,
CVE-2023-52681, CVE-2023-52453, CVE-2023-52611, CVE-2023-52622,
CVE-2024-26641, CVE-2023-52616, CVE-2024-26592, CVE-2023-52606,
CVE-2024-26620, CVE-2023-52692, CVE-2024-26669, CVE-2023-52623,
CVE-2023-52588, CVE-2024-26616, CVE-2024-26610, CVE-2024-35839,
CVE-2023-52490, CVE-2023-52672, CVE-2024-26612, CVE-2023-52617,
CVE-2023-52697, CVE-2024-26644, CVE-2023-52458, CVE-2023-52598,
CVE-2024-35841, CVE-2023-52664, CVE-2023-52635, CVE-2023-52676,
CVE-2023-52669, CVE-2024-26632, CVE-2023-52486, CVE-2024-26625,
CVE-2023-52608, CVE-2024-26634, CVE-2023-52599, CVE-2024-26618,
CVE-2024-26640, CVE-2023-52489, CVE-2023-52675, CVE-2023-52678,
CVE-2024-26583, CVE-2023-52693, CVE-2023-52498, CVE-2024-26649,
CVE-2023-52670, CVE-2023-52473, CVE-2023-52449, CVE-2023-52667,
CVE-2023-52467, CVE-2023-52686, CVE-2024-26633, CVE-2023-52666,
CVE-2024-35840, CVE-2024-26629, CVE-2024-26595, CVE-2023-52593,
CVE-2023-52687, CVE-2023-52465, CVE-2024-26627, CVE-2023-52493,
CVE-2023-52491, CVE-2024-26636, CVE-2024-26584, CVE-2023-52587,
CVE-2023-52597, CVE-2023-52462, CVE-2023-52633, CVE-2023-52696,
CVE-2024-26585, CVE-2023-52589, CVE-2023-52456, CVE-2023-52470,
CVE-2024-35838, CVE-2024-26645, CVE-2023-52591, CVE-2023-52464,
CVE-2023-52609, CVE-2024-26608, CVE-2023-52450, CVE-2023-52584,
CVE-2023-52469, CVE-2023-52583, CVE-2023-52451, CVE-2023-52495,
CVE-2023-52626, CVE-2023-52595, CVE-2023-52680, CVE-2023-52632,
CVE-2024-26582, CVE-2024-35837, CVE-2023-52494, CVE-2023-52614,
CVE-2023-52443, CVE-2023-52698, CVE-2023-52448, CVE-2024-26615,
CVE-2023-52452, CVE-2023-52492, CVE-2024-26647, CVE-2023-52468,
CVE-2023-52594, CVE-2023-52621, CVE-2024-26638, CVE-2024-26594,
CVE-2024-26673, CVE-2023-52457, CVE-2023-52677, CVE-2023-52607,
CVE-2024-26623, CVE-2023-52488, CVE-2023-52497, CVE-2023-52445,
CVE-2024-26607, CVE-2023-52610, CVE-2024-35842, CVE-2023-52690,
CVE-2023-52683, CVE-2023-52444, CVE-2024-26671, CVE-2023-52455,
CVE-2023-52679, CVE-2024-26598, CVE-2023-52674, CVE-2023-52627,
CVE-2023-52619, CVE-2023-52487, CVE-2023-52446, CVE-2024-35835,
CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52685, CVE-2023-52694, CVE-2024-26631)
A growing number of malware operators have turned to cloud-based command and control servers to deploy malicious campaigns, Fortinet researchers found
It was discovered that Ruby incorrectly handled the ungetbyte and ungetc
methods. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause Ruby to crash,
resulting in a denial of service, or possibly obtain sensitive information.