FEDORA-EPEL-2024-fd5dac4a76
Packages in this update:
apptainer-1.3.2-1.el7
Update description:
Update to upstream 1.3.2, including fix for CVE-2024-3727
apptainer-1.3.2-1.el7
Update to upstream 1.3.2, including fix for CVE-2024-3727
apptainer-1.3.2-1.fc39
Update to upstream 1.3.2, including fix for CVE-2024-3727
apptainer-1.3.2-1.el9
Update to upstream 1.3.2, including fix for CVE-2024-3727
apptainer-1.3.2-1.el8
Update to upstream 1.3.2, including fix for CVE-2024-3727
apptainer-1.3.2-1.fc40
Update to upstream 1.3.2, including fix for CVE-2024-3727
The U.S. Department of the Treasury today unveiled sanctions against three Chinese nationals for allegedly operating 911 S5, an online anonymity service that for many years was the easiest and cheapest way to route one’s Web traffic through malware-infected computers around the globe. KrebsOnSecurity identified one of the three men in a July 2022 investigation into 911 S5, which was massively hacked and then closed ten days later.
The 911 S5 botnet-powered proxy service, circa July 2022.
From 2015 to July 2022, 911 S5 sold access to hundreds of thousands of Microsoft Windows computers daily, as “proxies” that allowed customers to route their Internet traffic through PCs in virtually any country or city around the globe — but predominantly in the United States.
911 S5’s reliability and extremely low prices quickly made it one of the most popular services among denizens of the cybercrime underground, and the service become almost shorthand for connecting to that “last mile” of cybercrime. Namely, the ability to route one’s malicious traffic through a computer that is geographically close to the consumer whose stolen credit card is about to be used, or whose bank account is about to be emptied.
911 built its proxy network mainly by offering “free” virtual private networking (VPN) services. 911’s VPN performed largely as advertised for the user — allowing them to surf the web anonymously — but it also quietly turned the user’s computer into a traffic relay for paying 911 S5 customers.
In July 2022, KrebsOnSecurity published a deep dive into 911 S5, which found the people operating this business had a history of encouraging the installation of their proxy malware by any means available. That included paying affiliates to distribute their proxy software by secretly bundling it with other software.
A cached copy of flashupdate dot net, a pay-per-install affiliate program that incentivized the silent installation of 911’s proxy software.
That story named Yunhe Wang from Beijing as the apparent owner or manager of the 911 S5 proxy service. In today’s Treasury action, Mr. Wang was named as the primary administrator of the botnet that powered 911 S5.
“A review of records from network infrastructure service providers known to be utilized by 911 S5 and two Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) specific to the botnet operation (MaskVPN and DewVPN) showed Yunhe Wang as the registered subscriber to those providers’ services,” reads the Treasury announcement.
The sanctions say Jingping Liu was Yunhe Wang’s co-conspirator in the laundering of criminally derived proceeds generated from 911 S5, mainly virtual currency. The government alleges the virtual currencies paid by 911 S5 users were converted into U.S. dollars using over-the-counter vendors who wired and deposited funds into bank accounts held by Liu.
“Jingping Liu assisted Yunhe Wang by laundering criminally derived proceeds through bank accounts held in her name that were then utilized to purchase luxury real estate properties for Yunhe Wang,” the document continues. “These individuals leveraged their malicious botnet technology to compromise personal devices, enabling cybercriminals to fraudulently secure economic assistance intended for those in need and to terrorize our citizens with bomb threats.”
The third man sanctioned is Yanni Zheng, a Chinese national the U.S. Treasury says acted as an attorney for Wang and his firm — Spicy Code Company Limited — and helped to launder proceeds from the business into real estate holdings. Spicy Code Company was also sanctioned, as well as Wang-controlled properties Tulip Biz Pattaya Group Company Limited, and Lily Suites Company Limited.
Ten days after the July 2022 story here on 911 S5, the proxy network abruptly closed up shop, citing a data breach that destroyed key components of its business operations.
In the months that followed, however, 911 S5 would resurrect itself under a different name: Cloud Router. That’s according to spur.us, a U.S.-based startup that tracks proxy and VPN services. In February 2024, Spur published research showing the Cloud Router operators reused many of the same components from 911 S5, making it relatively simple to draw a connection between the two.
The Cloud Router homepage, which according to Spur has been unreachable since this past weekend.
Spur found that Cloud Router was being powered by a new VPN service called PaladinVPN, which made it much more explicit to users that their Internet connections were going to be used to relay traffic for others. At the time, Spur found Cloud Router had more than 140,000 Internet addresses for rent.
Spur co-founder Riley Kilmer said Cloud Router appears to have suspended or ceased operations sometime this past weekend. Kilmer said the number of proxies advertised by the service had been trending downwards quite recently before the website suddenly went offline.
Cloud Router’s homepage is currently populated by a message from Cloudflare saying the site’s domain name servers are pointing to a “prohibited IP.”
Zheng Wang discovered that the Broadcom FullMAC WLAN driver in the Linux
kernel contained a race condition during device removal, leading to a use-
after-free vulnerability. A physically proximate attacker could possibly
use this to cause a denial of service (system crash). (CVE-2023-47233)
It was discovered that the Open vSwitch implementation in the Linux kernel
could overflow its stack during recursive action operations under certain
conditions. A local attacker could use this to cause a denial of service
(system crash). (CVE-2024-1151)
Sander Wiebing, Alvise de Faveri Tron, Herbert Bos, and Cristiano Giuffrida
discovered that the Linux kernel mitigations for the initial Branch History
Injection vulnerability (CVE-2022-0001) were insufficient for Intel
processors. A local attacker could potentially use this to expose sensitive
information. (CVE-2024-2201)
Chenyuan Yang discovered that the RDS Protocol implementation in the Linux
kernel contained an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker could use
this to possibly cause a denial of service (system crash). (CVE-2024-23849)
Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
– PowerPC architecture;
– S390 architecture;
– Core kernel;
– Block layer subsystem;
– Android drivers;
– Power management core;
– Bus devices;
– Hardware random number generator core;
– Cryptographic API;
– Device frequency;
– DMA engine subsystem;
– ARM SCMI message protocol;
– GPU drivers;
– HID subsystem;
– Hardware monitoring drivers;
– I2C subsystem;
– IIO ADC drivers;
– IIO subsystem;
– IIO Magnetometer sensors drivers;
– InfiniBand drivers;
– Media drivers;
– Network drivers;
– PCI driver for MicroSemi Switchtec;
– PHY drivers;
– SCSI drivers;
– DesignWare USB3 driver;
– BTRFS file system;
– Ceph distributed file system;
– Ext4 file system;
– F2FS file system;
– JFS file system;
– NILFS2 file system;
– NTFS3 file system;
– Pstore file system;
– SMB network file system;
– Memory management;
– CAN network layer;
– Networking core;
– HSR network protocol;
– IPv4 networking;
– IPv6 networking;
– Logical Link layer;
– MAC80211 subsystem;
– Multipath TCP;
– Netfilter;
– NFC subsystem;
– SMC sockets;
– Sun RPC protocol;
– TIPC protocol;
– Unix domain sockets;
– Tomoyo security module;
– Realtek audio codecs;
(CVE-2023-52616, CVE-2024-26679, CVE-2024-26608, CVE-2023-52594,
CVE-2024-26622, CVE-2023-52643, CVE-2024-26594, CVE-2023-52598,
CVE-2023-52627, CVE-2023-52491, CVE-2024-26592, CVE-2024-26717,
CVE-2023-52638, CVE-2024-26704, CVE-2023-52637, CVE-2024-26645,
CVE-2023-52602, CVE-2024-26722, CVE-2024-26671, CVE-2023-52599,
CVE-2024-26720, CVE-2023-52631, CVE-2023-52486, CVE-2024-26640,
CVE-2023-52606, CVE-2023-52633, CVE-2024-26593, CVE-2024-26664,
CVE-2023-52618, CVE-2024-26625, CVE-2023-52604, CVE-2024-26695,
CVE-2024-26644, CVE-2024-26826, CVE-2024-26600, CVE-2024-26808,
CVE-2023-52619, CVE-2023-52597, CVE-2024-26602, CVE-2024-26635,
CVE-2023-52623, CVE-2024-26665, CVE-2024-26916, CVE-2024-26689,
CVE-2023-52635, CVE-2024-26712, CVE-2023-52614, CVE-2024-26606,
CVE-2024-26610, CVE-2024-26675, CVE-2023-52617, CVE-2024-26697,
CVE-2023-52595, CVE-2023-52494, CVE-2024-26641, CVE-2024-26698,
CVE-2024-26707, CVE-2024-26673, CVE-2023-52493, CVE-2024-26676,
CVE-2024-26910, CVE-2023-52601, CVE-2024-26660, CVE-2023-52608,
CVE-2024-26615, CVE-2023-52587, CVE-2024-26825, CVE-2023-52498,
CVE-2023-52492, CVE-2024-26668, CVE-2024-26715, CVE-2024-26685,
CVE-2024-26702, CVE-2024-26663, CVE-2024-26636, CVE-2024-26627,
CVE-2024-26696, CVE-2023-52583, CVE-2023-52642, CVE-2023-52489,
CVE-2024-26614, CVE-2024-26829, CVE-2024-26684, CVE-2023-52615,
CVE-2023-52435, CVE-2023-52530, CVE-2023-52607, CVE-2024-26920,
CVE-2023-52622, CVE-2023-52588)
As Americans make their travel plans, scammers lie in wait. We’ve uncovered the top ten “riskiest” destinations for travel scams — places that turn up the most unsafe results when you look them up online.
That list features prominently in this year’s Safer Summer Holidays’ Travel Report, which also reveals some striking survey findings.
Before we get to our top ten list, a little context helps put it into perspective. Based on our survey, more than 25% of Americans have been affected by travel scams. These take several forms, and generally, they involve some mix of phony booking sites, bogus rental listings, and travel experiences that never materialize. Other tricks like phishing emails and messages round out the mix.
That stat stands as words to the wise as most people said they’re gearing up for travel. A good 85% of Americans said they’re hitting the road this year. Moreover, 45% of them said they plan on spending more on travel this year than last.
No doubt about it, vacationers and trip-takers should keep a sharp eye out for travel scams this year.
With those forms of travel scams in mind, this year’s survey of travelers revealed several striking stats.
Whether it happened this year or in years prior, these scams included:
Providing their credit or bank card details on a fake site, which a scammer then used to make fraudulent payments (15%).
Clicking on a link from an unknown source that was a scam or malicious (10%).
Encountering manipulated photos of their holiday destination (8%).
Another 28% said they got hit with a scam when they arrived at their destination. Here’s what these scams looked like for travelers:
13% said they paid a deposit on accommodations that turned out not to exist or that had no record of their registration.
10% said they paid for an event or excursion where the provider never showed up.
9% said they put money down on an excursion which turned out completely unlike what was marketed.
How did all these scams add up? In all, we found that 32% of victims said they lost between $501-1000 in a single scam. Another 24% of victims said they lost $1,000 or more on a travel scam. Only a relatively small percentage of people said they lost nothing. Just 15%, a figure that shows just how successful travel scams can be.
This falls right in line with reports from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As published in their 2023 Data Book, more than 55,000 Americans reported a travel scam. The median loss — nearly $1,200 per case.[i] As always with FTC statistics, they only documented reported cases of fraud. The number of actual scams more than likely climbs higher than that.
Like the many other scams people come across online, several travel scams rely on sketchy links and sites. With that, further research helped us uncover which travel destinations have the highest amounts of sketchy links that turn up in search.
Using travel-related keywords like “discount,” “Airbnb,” “local cuisine,” and “tours,” we then paired them with a list of destinations. From that pairing, the following destinations returned more sketchy links than all others:
Berlin, Germany
Cyprus
London, England
Paris, France
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Bali, Indonesia
Azores, Portugal
Amalfi Coast, Italy
Bermuda
Machu Picchu, Peru
Booking any online travel calls for scrutiny and care. However, apparently scammers favor these destinations over others when targeting American travelers.
Trust a trusted platform.
That’s your best place to start. Book your vacation rental through a reputable outlet. Vacation rental platforms like Airbnb and VRBO have policies and processes in place that protect renters from scammers. The same goes for booking other travel needs above and beyond renting. Travel platforms such as Expedia, Priceline, Orbitz, and others have their own protections in place.
From there, you have several other ways you can avoid booking scams …
Look for signs of rental scams.
Do a reverse image search on the photos used in the property’s listing and see what comes up. It might be a piece of stock photography designed to trick you into thinking it was taken at an actual property for rent. (Scammers sometimes highjack photos of actual properties not for rent too. Some now use AI-generated images as well.) Also, read the reviews for the property. Listings with no reviews are a red flag.
Only communicate and pay on the platform.
The moment a host asks to communicate outside of the platform is another red flag. Scammers will try to lure you off the platform where they can request payment in forms that are difficult to recover or trace after you realize you’ve been scammed.
Moreover, paying for your rental outside the platform might also go against the terms of service, as in the case of Airbnb. Or, as with VRBO, paying outside the platform voids their “Book with Confidence Guarantee,” which offers you certain protections. Use the platform to pay and use a credit card when you do. In the U.S., the Fair Credit Billing Act allows you to dispute charges. Additionally, some credit cards offer their own anti-fraud protections that can help you dispute a billing.
Never pay with cryptocurrency, wire transfers, or gift cards.
If someone asks you to pay for your trip one of these ways. It’s a scam. Travel scammers prefer these payment methods because they’re exceptionally tough to track. Once that money gets sent, it’s likely exceptionally tough to get back.
Keep an eye out for phishing attacks.
Scammers use phishing emails and messages to trick travelers into revealing sensitive info or downloading malware onto their devices. As you book, look for unsolicited messages claiming to be from airlines, hotels, or financial institutions. Particularly if they ask for personal info or prompt you to click on suspicious links. When in question, contact the sender directly using official contact info from their official website.
Also, look into McAfee Scam Protection, included with our McAfee+ plans. It blocks links to scam sites that crop up in emails, messages, and texts. AI technology automatically scans the links and alerts you if it might send you to a scam site.
Let your bank and credit card companies know you’re traveling.
Give your bank and credit card companies a call before you head out. They have anti-fraud measures in place that look for unusual activity, such as when your card is used in a location other than somewhere relatively near your home. This can trigger a freeze, which can put you in a lurch if you’re looking to withdraw cash or make a payment. Contacting your bank and credit card companies before you travel can help prevent this.
Have an easy way to keep tabs on your accounts and credit.
Fraud can happen at any time, even when you’re out of town. A couple of things can help you nip it quickly before it takes a big bite out of your credit card or bank accounts. Transaction monitoring notifies you of any questionable activity in your credit cards or bank accounts. It can further alert you to any other questionable activity in your 401(k) plans, investments, and loans.
So, say that your debit card info got skimmed in a sketchy ATM or point-of-sale machine — you’ll get an alert if thieves try to make a purchase with it. From there, you can contact your bank and take the extra step of putting a security freeze in place to prevent further fraud. You can security freeze and transaction monitoring features in our McAfee+ plans as well.
Protect your identity.
Before you hop on a plane, train, or automobile, consider investing in identity protection. This way, you can head off any issues that might crop up when you should be enjoying yourself. For example, imagine losing your wallet. Immediately, a dark cloud of “what ifs” rolls in. What if someone’s running up charges on your cards? What if someone used your ID or insurance cards to impersonate you online? Not a great feeling any time, especially on vacation.
With identity theft coverage and restoration in place, you can recoup your losses and restore your identity if a thief damaged it in any way. Ours provides up to $2 million in coverage, along with lost wallet protection that cancels and replaces lost cards with little effort from you.
Top 10 ‘Riskiest’ Online Destinations Overview and Methodology
The research was conducted by McAfee Labs researchers between March 11th – 29th 2024, utilizing McAfee WebAdvisor to find risky URLs related to a range of popular holiday destinations. This includes web pages delivering malware threats, phishing, or scam content. Researchers queried country-specific search engines from the matching locations with a variety of holiday destination terms and calculated the percentage of risky URLs returned within the search results. The final result of “riskiest” online destinations means the cities and countries that are popular search subjects and therefore key targets for cybercriminals when creating phishing and other online scams.
[i] https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/CSN-Annual-Data-Book-2023.pdf
The post The Top 10 Riskiest Online Destinations Revealed appeared first on McAfee Blog.
chromium-125.0.6422.112-1.fc39
update to 125.0.6422.112
High CVE-2024-5274: Type Confusion in V8
chromium-125.0.6422.112-2.fc40
update to 125.0.6422.112
High CVE-2024-5274: Type Confusion in V8